Thursday, 7 August 2025

A High-Gain fOXX Tone Machine Clone?



Doom on a Dime_ Temu Fuzz Pedal Review



 Alright, let’s crack this thing open and see what kind of sorcery is packed inside this new version.


It uses the same circuit found in many cheap mini fuzz pedals that cost around 20–30 euros, but it's even cheaper. (9€)





What we’ve got here is a surface-mount layout—SMD components all the way. 

It’s definitely not a Big Muff clone. 

Think of it as a lo-fi cousin of the Tone Machine—less refined, more brutal, and perfect for garage psych or synth abuse.

fOXX Tone Machine Schematic

Originally released in 1971, the Tone Machine was a fuzz monster—thick, aggressive, and with a gnarly octave-up mode. It was discontinued in the late '70s.

No frills, no fancy enclosure, just raw fuzz.

 For under 10€, this is kind of insane.

You won’t find vintage carbon comp resistors or big old caps here—it’s all modern SMD with 4 2N5172 transistors. But if it nails the tone, who cares? 


Not only does this pedal mimic the fOXX Tone Machine’s layout, but it goes further—packing four 2N5172 transistors. That’s more gain, more bite, and potentially more fuzz. 

(For a more vintage sound you can swap the transistor easily, and that’s one of the best ways to shape the character of the fuzz.) 

About the 2N5172

  • Silicon NPN transistor, known for low noise and high gain

  • Common in vintage fuzz circuits like the Big Muff.

  • Adds tight response and aggressive clipping—perfect for doom and sludge.

Gain Comparison: 2N3565 vs 2N5172

TransistorTypical Gain (hFE)Noise LevelTone CharacterCommon Use
2N3565~200–300LowSmooth,
vintage fuzz
Harmonic Percolator,
DIY fuzzes
2N5172~400–500Very LowHigh-gain,
aggressive fuzz
Big Muff clones,
modern fuzz builds

What This Means for Fuzz

  • 2N3565: Medium gain, great for vintage-style fuzz with a bit of texture. Can produce slight octave effects in older units.

  • 2N5172: Higher gain, tighter response, and more saturation. Ideal for doom, sludge, and stacked fuzz tones.

Let’s plug it in and see if it roars.

Tuesday, 5 August 2025

Zakk Wylde Overdrive vs Boss SD-1 Super Overdrive

 

Zakk Wylde Overdrive vs. Boss SD-1 Super Overdrive: A Tone Showdown

Both pedals are beloved in the guitar world, but they cater to slightly different sonic preferences. Here's a breakdown to help you decide which suits your style better.

Zakk Wylde Overdrive (MXR ZW-44)

  • Designed for: High-gain, aggressive tones—ideal for metal and hard rock.
  • More gain than the SD-1
  • Retains low-end better than the SD-1
  • Adds more color and grit to your tone
  • Best Use: Boosting a semi-cranked tube amp for sustain and punch
  • Pros: Great for solos and heavy rhythm
  • Cons: Can be noisy, less transparent than SD-1
(The MXR GT-OD has a switch inside that turns it into the ZW-44)

Boss SD-1 Super Overdrive

  • Designed for: Classic rock, blues, and general-purpose overdrive
  • Asymmetrical clipping for tube-like response
  • Slight low-end cut when engaged
  • Smooth, medium-gain overdrive
  • Best Use: Driving tube amps or stacking with other pedals
  • Pros: Transparent and versatile, affordable and widely available
  • Cons: May sound thin without amp support, less aggressive than the ZW-44

Head-to-Head Summary

Feature MXR ZW-44 Boss SD-1 Super Overdrive
Gain Level High Medium
Tone Transparency Colored Transparent
Low-End Retention Strong Slight cut
Ideal Genre Metal, Hard Rock Classic Rock, Blues
Price Point Higher (used market) Lower (new and used)

Some players even mod the SD-1 to match the ZW-44 specs.

ZW-44 Output Buffer — Is It Missing?

Yes — the MXR Zakk Wylde Overdrive (ZW-44) does not include an output buffer, unlike the Boss SD-1, which features both input and output buffering as part of its FET switching system.

Why This Matters

Feature ZW-44 SD-1
Output Buffer Not present Present
Bypass Type True bypass (mechanical) Buffered bypass (FET)
Impedance Handling Less consistent Stable across setups


Without an output buffer, the ZW-44 is more susceptible to tone loss, especially with long cable runs or low-impedance loads. It’s best placed in front of the amp.

The SD-1’s output buffer is part of its Boss-standard FET switching system, which ensures consistent output impedance whether the pedal is on or off. The ZW-44, being a simpler MXR-style design, opts for true bypass and omits the buffer.

If you're building or modding your own version, adding an output buffer to the ZW-44 circuit is totally doable—but I don't recommend this mod.


Monday, 4 August 2025

Clean Boost vs Overdrive

 



Σύγκριση: Clean Boost vs Overdrive

ΧαρακτηριστικόClean BoostOverdrive / Distortion
ΣκοπόςΕνίσχυση σήματος χωρίς παραμόρφωσηΕνίσχυση + παραμόρφωση μέσω clipping
Clipping ΑπουσιάζειΥπάρχει (διόδοι ή opamp saturation)
Gain RangeΈως 20–30 dB (ή και 40+ dB)Περιορίζεται από το clipping
Τάση ΕξόδουΜπορεί να φτάσει κοντά στο railΠεριορίζεται από το threshold των διόδων
ΧρήσηΓια να "πιέσει" τον ενισχυτήΓια να προσθέσει χαρακτήρα/drive

 Γιατί το Overdrive έχει χαμηλότερο πραγματικό κέρδος;

  • Το clipping κόβει την τάση εξόδου μόλις ξεπεραστεί το threshold (π.χ. 1.4V για 2 x 1N4148).
  • Το opamp μπορεί να έχει περιορισμένο headroom.
  • Το output volume pot μειώνει την τάση πριν φτάσει στον ενισχυτή.
  • Το σχεδιαστικό ζητούμενο είναι η παραμόρφωση, όχι η καθαρή ενίσχυση.

 Παράδειγμα Clean Boost

Ένα pedal όπως το MXR Micro Amp ή το LPB-1 της Electro-Harmonix μπορεί να δώσει:

  • 40+ dB καθαρού gain
  • Χωρίς clipping
  • Με πλήρη αξιοποίηση της τάσης τροφοδοσίας


Αν θέλεις καθαρή ενίσχυση, τα booster pedals είναι πιο κατάλληλα. Αν θέλεις χαρακτήρα, παραμόρφωση και δυναμική, τα overdrive/distortion pedals είναι η λύση — αλλά με περιορισμένο πραγματικό gain λόγω clipping.